Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!
По всем вопросам обращайтесь на: info@litportal.ru
(©) 2003-2024.
✖
John Knox and the Reformation
Настройки чтения
Размер шрифта
Высота строк
Поля
Knox, i. 341,342; vi. 24. Did the brethren promise nothing but the evacuation of Perth?
127
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 58.
128
Knox, i. 343, 344. The Congregation are said to have left Perth on May 29. They assert their presence there on May 31, in their Band.
129
Edinburgh Burgh Records.
130
But see Knox, i. 347-349. Is a week (June 4 to June 11) accidentally omitted?
131
Writing on June 23, Knox dates the “Reformation” “June 14.” His dates, at this point, though recorded within three weeks, are to me inexplicable. Knox, vi. 25.
132
Keith, i. 265, note.
133
Lesley, ii. 443, Scottish Text Society.
134
For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 367.
135
Knox, vi. 26.
136
Ibid., i. 355.
137
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 60.
138
Knox, vi. 26.
139
See Scottish Historical Review, January 1905, 121-122, 128-130.
140
Bain, i. 215.
141
For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 278. Erroneously dated “May 24” (?).
142
Bain, i. 216-218; For. Cal. Eliz., ut supra, 335, 336.
143
Archives Etrangéres, Angleterre, vol. xv. MS.
144
For. Cal. Eliz., 336; Knox, i. 359, 360.
145
Knox, i. 360-362.
146
Knox dates the entry of the Reformers into Edinburgh on June 29. But he wrote to Mrs. Locke from Edinburgh on June 25, probably a misprint. The date June 29 is given in the “Historie.” Knox dates a letter to Cecil, “Edinburgh, June 28.” The Diurnal of Occurrents dates the sack of monasteries in Edinburgh June 28.
147
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 62; Knox, i. 366, 367, 370.
148
Knox, i. 363; cf. Keith, i. 213, 214; Spottiswoode, i. 280, 281.
149
Knox, i. 363-365; For. Cal. Eliz., 337.
150
Teulet, i. 338-340.
151
127
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 58.
128
Knox, i. 343, 344. The Congregation are said to have left Perth on May 29. They assert their presence there on May 31, in their Band.
129
Edinburgh Burgh Records.
130
But see Knox, i. 347-349. Is a week (June 4 to June 11) accidentally omitted?
131
Writing on June 23, Knox dates the “Reformation” “June 14.” His dates, at this point, though recorded within three weeks, are to me inexplicable. Knox, vi. 25.
132
Keith, i. 265, note.
133
Lesley, ii. 443, Scottish Text Society.
134
For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 367.
135
Knox, vi. 26.
136
Ibid., i. 355.
137
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 60.
138
Knox, vi. 26.
139
See Scottish Historical Review, January 1905, 121-122, 128-130.
140
Bain, i. 215.
141
For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 278. Erroneously dated “May 24” (?).
142
Bain, i. 216-218; For. Cal. Eliz., ut supra, 335, 336.
143
Archives Etrangéres, Angleterre, vol. xv. MS.
144
For. Cal. Eliz., 336; Knox, i. 359, 360.
145
Knox, i. 360-362.
146
Knox dates the entry of the Reformers into Edinburgh on June 29. But he wrote to Mrs. Locke from Edinburgh on June 25, probably a misprint. The date June 29 is given in the “Historie.” Knox dates a letter to Cecil, “Edinburgh, June 28.” The Diurnal of Occurrents dates the sack of monasteries in Edinburgh June 28.
147
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 62; Knox, i. 366, 367, 370.
148
Knox, i. 363; cf. Keith, i. 213, 214; Spottiswoode, i. 280, 281.
149
Knox, i. 363-365; For. Cal. Eliz., 337.
150
Teulet, i. 338-340.
151
Другие электронные книги автора Andrew Lang
Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!