Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!
По всем вопросам обращайтесь на: info@litportal.ru
(©) 2003-2024.
✖
John Knox and the Reformation
Настройки чтения
Размер шрифта
Высота строк
Поля
Knox, iv. 501, 502.
78
Knox, iv. 358. Zurich Letters, 34-36.
79
Knox, iv. 486, 488.
80
Wodrow Miscellany, vol. i.
81
Here the “Historie of the Estate” is corroborated by the Treasurer’s Accounts, recording payment to Rothesay Herald. He is summoning George Lovell, David Ferguson (a preacher, later minister of Dunfermline), and others unnamed to appear at Edinburgh on July 28, to answer for “wrongous using and wresting of the Scriptures, disputing upon erroneous opinions, and eating flesh in Lent,” and at other times forbidden by Acts of Parliament (M‘Crie, 359, note G). Nothing is here said about riotous iconoclasm, but Lovell had been at the hanging of an image of St. Francis as early as 1543, and in many such godly exercises, or was accused of these acts of zeal.
82
“Historie of the Estate of Scotland,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 53-55.
83
Knox, i. 301.
84
Knox appears (he is very vague) to date Calder’s petition after Willock’s second visit, which the “Historie of the Estate of Scotland” places in October 1558. Dr. M‘Crie accepts that date, but finds that Knox places Calder’s petition before the burning of Myln, in April 1559. Dr. M‘Crie suggests that perhaps Calder petitioned twice, but deems Knox in the right. As the Reformer contradicts himself, unless there were two Calder petitions (i. 301, i. 307), he must have made an oversight.
85
Hume Brown, John Knox, ii. Appendix, 301-303.
86
Knox, i. 301-306
87
Knox, i. 294, 301-312. On p. 294 Knox dates the Parliament in October.
88
Knox, i. 309-312.
89
Knox, i. 312-314.
90
See Laing’s edition, i. 320, 321.
91
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 55.
92
M‘Crie, Knox, 359, 360.
93
Knox, i. 306, 307.
94
Knox, i. 307.
95
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 55, 56.
96
Knox, i. 312-314.
97
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, 56.
98
Melville, 76, 77 (1827).
But Professor Hume Brown appears to be misled in saying that Bettencourt, or Bethencourt, did not reach Scotland till June (John Knox, i. 344i note i), citing Forbes, i. 141. Bethencourt “passed Berwick on April 13” (For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 214) to negotiate the Scottish part in the peace, signed at Upsettlington (May 31). Bethencourt would be with the Regent by April 15, and he may have confirmed her in summoning the preachers who defied her proclamations, though, with or without his advice, she could do no less.
99
Pitscottie, ii. 523.
100
State Papers, Borders, vol. i. No. 421 MS.
101
Affaires Etrangéres, Angleterre, vol. xv. MS.
78
Knox, iv. 358. Zurich Letters, 34-36.
79
Knox, iv. 486, 488.
80
Wodrow Miscellany, vol. i.
81
Here the “Historie of the Estate” is corroborated by the Treasurer’s Accounts, recording payment to Rothesay Herald. He is summoning George Lovell, David Ferguson (a preacher, later minister of Dunfermline), and others unnamed to appear at Edinburgh on July 28, to answer for “wrongous using and wresting of the Scriptures, disputing upon erroneous opinions, and eating flesh in Lent,” and at other times forbidden by Acts of Parliament (M‘Crie, 359, note G). Nothing is here said about riotous iconoclasm, but Lovell had been at the hanging of an image of St. Francis as early as 1543, and in many such godly exercises, or was accused of these acts of zeal.
82
“Historie of the Estate of Scotland,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 53-55.
83
Knox, i. 301.
84
Knox appears (he is very vague) to date Calder’s petition after Willock’s second visit, which the “Historie of the Estate of Scotland” places in October 1558. Dr. M‘Crie accepts that date, but finds that Knox places Calder’s petition before the burning of Myln, in April 1559. Dr. M‘Crie suggests that perhaps Calder petitioned twice, but deems Knox in the right. As the Reformer contradicts himself, unless there were two Calder petitions (i. 301, i. 307), he must have made an oversight.
85
Hume Brown, John Knox, ii. Appendix, 301-303.
86
Knox, i. 301-306
87
Knox, i. 294, 301-312. On p. 294 Knox dates the Parliament in October.
88
Knox, i. 309-312.
89
Knox, i. 312-314.
90
See Laing’s edition, i. 320, 321.
91
Wodrow Miscellany, i. 55.
92
M‘Crie, Knox, 359, 360.
93
Knox, i. 306, 307.
94
Knox, i. 307.
95
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, i. 55, 56.
96
Knox, i. 312-314.
97
“Historie,” Wodrow Miscellany, 56.
98
Melville, 76, 77 (1827).
But Professor Hume Brown appears to be misled in saying that Bettencourt, or Bethencourt, did not reach Scotland till June (John Knox, i. 344i note i), citing Forbes, i. 141. Bethencourt “passed Berwick on April 13” (For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 214) to negotiate the Scottish part in the peace, signed at Upsettlington (May 31). Bethencourt would be with the Regent by April 15, and he may have confirmed her in summoning the preachers who defied her proclamations, though, with or without his advice, she could do no less.
99
Pitscottie, ii. 523.
100
State Papers, Borders, vol. i. No. 421 MS.
101
Affaires Etrangéres, Angleterre, vol. xv. MS.
Другие электронные книги автора Andrew Lang
Последний отзыв
Очень интересная!