13. Kim P. et al. (ed.). The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. – Harvard University Press, 2011. – 744 p.
14. Kwon K. S. Emergence of research and entrepreneurial activities of Korean universities // Conference on University-Industry Linkages and Economic Performance, College of Social Science, Seoul National University, 27th Feb. – 2009.
15. Lee Y. H., Kim Y. J. Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2016. – Vol. 110. – P. 93—105.
16. Lengyel B., Leydesdorff L. Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level // Regional Studies. – 2011. – Vol. 45. – №5. – P. 677—693.
17. Leydesdorff L. Configurational information as potentially negative entropy: the Triple Helix model // Entropy. – 2008. – Vol. 10. – №4. – P. 391—410.
18. Leydesdorff L. The triple helix, quadruple helix,…, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? // Journal of the knowledge economy. – 2012. – Vol. 3. – №1. – P. 25—35.
19. Leydesdorff L., Fritsch M. Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics // Research policy. – 2006. – Vol. 35. – №10. – P. 1538—1553.
20. Leydesdorff L., Sun Y. National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University—industry—government versus international coauthorship relations // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. – 2009. – Vol. 60. – №4. – P. 778—788.
21. OECD. Main science and technology indicators // OECD Publishing. – 2014. – №1.
22. Park H. W., Hong H. D., Leydesdorff L. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators // Scientometrics. – 2005. – Vol. 65. – №1. – P. 3—27.
23. Park H. W., Leydesdorff L. Longitudinal trends in networks of university—industry—government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives // Research policy. – 2010. – Vol. 39. – №5. – P. 640—649.